Asking ChatGPT a Legal Question



This site utilizes Google Analytics, Google AdSense, as well as participates in affiliate partnerships with various companies including Amazon. Please view the privacy policy for more details.

I’m serving as Treasurer for my county’s Libertarian political party. Recently the county board of elections emailed me asking for some documentation about a few old expenses.

I don’t have any problem with providing the documentation. I’m not the kind of libertarian that is more contrarian than anything else. Heck, I value transparency. (Although what extra transparency is provided by providing proof that we spent money versus us just reporting that we spent money?)

But I wondered - did I have to provide the documentation? Was it a legal requirement? Was it supposed to be originally provided?

So I asked ChatGPT. But not just “am I supposed to?” The thing is, I don’t trust any LLM response, especially to such a legal question. So I not only asked it am I legally required but also asked it to provide sources.

And then I checked those sources. I don’t want it hallucinating sources.

In the end, yes, I am supposed to provide documentation. “Receipts.” Which can be anything from a cancelled check, a bank statement with the necessary info, or a receipted bill (whatever than means).

In case you’re curious, here’s my prompt:

I’m in Ohio filing finance reports for my local political party as the treasurer. The county election commission is asking for receipts for various expenses. Is providing these receipts a legal requirement, and if so, where is that specified?

And here’s ChatGPT’s response:

Yes. For an Ohio political party, there is a statutory requirement to provide supporting documentation for expenditures over $25. The relevant provisions are in Ohio Revised Code Chapter 3517 and the Ohio Administrative Code.

The key statute: R.C. 3517.10

Ohio Revised Code § 3517.10 applies specifically to political parties, among other political entities. It says:

“Every expenditure in excess of twenty-five dollars shall be vouched for by a receipted bill, stating the purpose of the expenditure, that shall be filed with the statement of expenditures.”

It also says that a canceled check with a notation of the purpose of the expenditure qualifies as a receipted bill. ([Ohio Laws][1])

So, if your county political party reports, for example:

  • $50 printing expense
  • $125 catering expense
  • $300 advertising expense

those expenditures need supporting documentation.

Ohio Revised Code § 3517.10

There’s an important distinction about what counts as a “receipt”

The Ohio Administrative Code provides more detail in OAC 111:2-4-13.

It says that expenditures must be recorded with the:

  • name and address of the payee
  • date
  • amount
  • purpose of the expenditure

And it specifically says that records related to expenditure activity must be retained.

For an expenditure over $25, the rule says the requirement can be satisfied with any one of:

  1. A receipted bill
  2. A canceled check
  3. A bank account statement containing the payee, amount, date, and check number

That’s potentially significant in your situation. The law doesn’t necessarily require an itemized store receipt for every expenditure. A canceled check or qualifying bank statement can satisfy the statutory “vouching” requirement.

OAC 111:2-4-13 — Accounting for contributions and expenditures

From what I understand, ChatGPT was tweaked a little while back to provide sources, so it may have done so even had I not asked. Regardless, I still found it important to actually check the sources.

I’ve deep-linked the following two links to the Ohio Revised Code and Ohio Administrative Code, but in case that deep-link doesn’t work, the link text is also what is deep linked:

And, in case you’re wondering, I did provide the documentation to the Board of Elections, and I will keep in mind that $25 requirement for the future.

Leave a Reply

Note that comments won't appear until approved.